A person who has equitable title is a person who has the right to obtain full ownership of property and possibly to obtain the legal right to the property. Essentially, the trustee holds simple ownership of property that was transferred to him by the trustee during the execution of the trust deed. You have a legal title if your name appears as a fellow on a certificate. The legal title is an “apparent” good or a documented good on paper. You can assume that your ownership of a property is entirely associated with a legal claim, but this is not the case. Another party may have fair title that limits some of the ways you can use and enjoy the property. A legal title refers to the responsibilities and obligations that the owner has in the maintenance, use and control of a property. Legal title is the beneficial ownership of the property. The documented name of the owner, as it is visible in public records, usually describes the person with legal title. Legal title grants true ownership of the property and all that this implies – the set of rights that comes with land ownership. These rights include: Let`s look at the interaction between legal title and fair title in a typical real estate transaction. What is the difference between a legal title and a fair title? When buying a property, it is important to obtain a fair title. This will be accompanied by the right to obtain full ownership and participation in ownership in the future.

The cheap title justifies the financial interest of the person in the property. For example, a real estate investor may own a fair security, but not a legal security. Fair title holders benefit from the increase in the value of the property. Upon receipt of title, a person with equitable title can transfer the property to someone else and keep the difference in the price of the house due to the increase in value. A person who has legal title has all the rights, duties and obligations of an owner, such as the maintenance of the property, use and control. In this example, the borrower (the owner) retains all other rights associated with the property (except for legal title), such as: With words like “benefit” and “enjoy,” you can assume that equitable title does not come with many property rights. In fact, the opposite is true. For example, the person with equitable title is often responsible for financing the property. The just title gives the right to access property and, above all, the right to acquire the formal legal title of the country. Keep in mind that fair title does not actually transfer ownership of the property. It simply gives the person or entity the right to use and enjoy the property. Legal title means that you have legal rights (or obligations) with respect to: An escrow deed is signed to establish a mortgage mortgage where the trustee has the effective legal right to the property.

A person who has full and absolute ownership of a property has legal title and ownership of the property. When legal title is exempt from other rights associated with property, we say that the legal title has become “bare” or “bare.” When signing the contract, the buyer does not have legal ownership of the property, as certain conditions must be met. A person who fully owns a property owns the legal title and owns the title deed. Equitable title and title can often overlap when it comes to a trust. Dividing the ownership of a property between different people can be a good idea if the owner has more than one beneficiary. One person may have the right to receive property, while another person may have rights regarding the benefits and use of the property after the death or transfer of the property by the owner. The security may go to a trustee for a certain period of time, while the equitable title may go to another beneficiary who receives a security after a certain date. The terms title and title deed are sometimes confused and even used synonymously. Finally, the legal documentation must be signed at closing (the seller must legally transfer the title deed). Until the legal documents are signed at closing, the buyer has a right or economic interest in the property. Finally, if the real estate transaction takes place officially at closing, the beneficial ownership of the property is transferred, and then the buyer`s just title becomes a legal title.

The main difference between equitable title and legal title is that the latter is the only one that confers beneficial ownership of the property. There are many smaller and more complicated differences that can vary from case to case. In general, equitable title gives a person the right to use the land and enjoy the benefits that come with their property. The title does not necessarily grant these rights. Equitable title does not allow the holder of the title to sell or transfer property. The legal title is the only title that can do this. Legal title has the advantage over equity, as it allows the right holder to claim compensation from the parties who purchase or rent the property. Legal rights to a property can be separated and assigned to different people. In addition, the person with the legal title may also have a clear right to own the property. Insolvency lawyers are often confronted with clients who “own” real estate with a parent. Often, the client did not contribute financially to the purchase or maintenance of the property, and the only reason the client`s name was written on the title to the property was for estate planning purposes for the parent company. In this situation, when the customer files for bankruptcy under Chapter 7, the question arises as to whether the customer-debtor`s interest in the asset becomes the property of the bankruptcy estate.

Another problem arises if the client transfers his interests to his parent company before filing for bankruptcy. Is this a fraudulent transfer? The analysis of these issues includes the legal concepts of the simple legal title and the resulting trusts. A Florida bankruptcy court recently issued an opinion on these legal concepts. The trustee also relied on the 10th District precedent, in which the court concluded that the resulting State Trust Act “does not apply if ownership of the property is assumed in the colocation.” The BAP attempted to distinguish this precedent from the 10th Circuit of the present case on a factual basis. Among other things, the debtor and his mother were available to testify that the intention was for the debtor to hold the property in trust for the mother, while the parents who had established a trust in the previous case were not alive to testify. Essentially, the beneficiaries have equitable title to the property, while the trustee has bare title. In other words, a naked title is a “mere legal title” that does not confer on the holder of the title any of the rights attached to full ownership. To transfer title to a property or transfer the rights to another person, you must use the title deed to do so. In some cases, a bank, financial institution, or lender may require the borrower to transfer ownership of a property (such as land, house, or other) to a trustee until the loan is fully repaid. Although the buyer provides the property to the bank as collateral to secure the loan, the buyer retains legal ownership of the property.

However, a title is not the same as a title deed. The trustee challenged this finding, arguing that the colocation was inconsistent with a resulting trust. In particular, “a flatshare requires the `four units` of time, title, interest and ownership.” The trustee argued that this means that “the shares of ordinary tenants are all the same and that the duration and quality, legal or equitable, of their estates are the same.” In this case, given that the common-law partner held both legal and cheap ownership of one-third of the property, the trustee argued that the debtor and his sister should have legal and equitable title as roommates.